Making the case for a net positive impact on biodiversity

Exploring how a Net Positive Impact (NPI) approach on biodiversity can enable the private sector to better manage biodiversity and contribute to global conservation is the focus of two new papers released today under the auspices of the NPI Alliance.

Bonn, 15th of March 2016

The paper, Net Positive Impact on biodiversity: the business case, highlights the increase in voluntary commitments to NPI by the private sector during the past decade. Two major reasons cited for business uptake are the rise in government biodiversity offset regulations and financial institutions’ standards for biodiversity management.

The NPI approach requires companies to take a systematic and scientific approach to evaluate their biodiversity impacts, establish biodiversity conservation goals and implement actions that actually achieve a biodiversity net gain over time. While the paper acknowledges that such an approach may entail some costs and delays for companies, it argues these far outweigh the risks of not applying NPI.

"Adopting NPI – as a company-wide commitment, project target or even aspirational goal – makes sound business sense as it supports long-term business value. It provides a robust means of understanding biodiversity impacts and defining an end-goal for impact mitigation, so that projects can be designed and implemented effectively and sustainably,” according to the authors.

The NPI Alliance was a cross-sectoral collaborative initiative with Rio Tinto plc, Shell Global Solutions International B.V., The Nature Conservancy and IUCN, with advisory support from the International Finance Corporation, which ended last year.  

IUCN is currently drafting a Biodiversity Offsets Policy, which may provide further guidance and input on advancing an NPI approach for biodiversity.

Tags: Ecosystem valuation | Biodiversity policy

Other articles you might be interested in:

European Commission publishes a guideline on the application of ABS Regulation
On the 27th of August 2016 a “Guidance document on the scope of application and core obligations of Regulation (EU ) No 511/2014” was published by the European Parliament and the Council. It includes definitions of keywords and a description of the scope of application using practice-oriented examples.

Natural Capital Protocol launched
Global leaders convened to launch new framework that will help businesses make better decisions by including natural capital.

Defra report: Lessons learned from biodiversity offsetting markets
This study (Duke and ten Kate 2014, published in 2016) was commissioned by Defra to assist with the development of policy on biodiversity offsetting, in particular to support more detailed economic appraisal of the policy options identified in the 2013 Green Paper on Biodiversity Offsetting in England.

Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing edges closer to reaching goal of 100 ratifications by year’s end
Ratifications by Togo, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has brought the total number of ratifications to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits arising from their Utilization to 72. The Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity was adopted at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties in 2010, in Nagoya, Japan, and entered into force on 12 October 2014.

BirdLife Europe releases the mid - term assessment of the EU Biodiversity strategy
In a new publication, “Halfway there?”, today BirdLife Europe presents its assessment of progress in the first five years of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. The report finds that although important progress has been made in some areas, overall the EU is still failing to reverse the decline of biodiversity, many plants and animals are threatened with extinction in the EU.

Twitter Xing Facebook LInkedIN

A Simple Explanation of Business & Biodiversity!

Featured video


Media Partners